Author
Published
5 December 2024
Reading time
Direct debit is a payment instrument that has played a vital role in payment transactions for decades. It offers the service provider a convenient way to have regular payments automatically deducted from the customer’s account. This makes life easier for both consumers and companies, as they no longer have to worry about paying invoices on time or sending reminders for outstanding payments. To prevent fraud and protect consumer rights, the payer also has the ability to dispute an unauthorized charge within a specified period of time, triggering an immediate chargeback.
While Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom introduced direct debits in the 1960s, Switzerland followed suit in 1977. With the advent of computer technology and digitalization in the 1980s and 1990s, direct debits underwent their first technological change. Banks and payment service providers developed systems that allowed direct debits to be processed electronically, reducing error rates and processing times. While processing was electronic, certain processes, such as the conclusion of the necessary direct debit agreement between the payee and the payer, remained paper-based. This is not surprising, as the electronic user interfaces required for an end-to-end digital process were not yet available on the customer side. However, paper-based processes are notoriously inefficient, time-consuming, and therefore expensive. They are susceptible to human error, such as incorrect or inaccurate information. Physical documents are easier to steal or tamper with, increasing the risk of fraud and misuse. Or they get left in the mail on the way to the bank, or get lost and have to be recreated. This takes time and causes frustration.
In an increasingly digital world, analog direct debit solutions with remaining paper-based processes are coming under increasing pressure for the reasons mentioned above. Especially in times when private individuals prefer digital and mobile payment methods, it is essential that direct debits are fully digitized and ideally embedded in existing systems or customer portals where they can find a broad user base. This is crucial to minimize the risks and drawbacks mentioned above and to improve the efficiency, security, and sustainability of direct debit solutions.
A good example of digitization is the SEPA Direct Debit Scheme, which was launched at the end of 2010. It allows direct debits to be processed electronically without a physical signature. This facilitates integration with online banking, mobile applications, and e-invoicing platforms. With just a few clicks, consumers can set up their own direct debits, check the payments they have made, cancel them if necessary, or have unjustified debits reversed immediately. Another benefit from the issuer’s point of view is the ability to flexibly adjust payments, which is particularly advantageous for variable costs such as electricity or telephone bills. In addition, the issuer can check the status of issued direct debit authorizations in real time and renew them if necessary. The status of submitted claims can also be queried. This improves the customer experience and increases acceptance of direct debit as a payment method in the digital age.
In the meantime, the Swiss financial center has harmonized payment transactions and adapted them to the ISO 20022 payment standard. The two current direct debit procedures used by Swiss banks, LSV+ and BDD, do not yet fully comply with this standard. However, harmonization of payment standards is the basis for efficient and competitive Swiss payment transactions in the future. LSV+ and BDD will have to make further investments in technology and formats in the coming years in order to meet today’s requirements for a modern direct debit solution. In addition, the physical signature of the debit authorization on the forms still required by LSV+ and BDD no longer meets today’s standards and the digitization strategy in payment transactions. At the same time, declining transaction volumes show that users are increasingly switching to alternative payment methods that are easier to set up and manage. As the operator of the standard direct debit procedures, SIX has therefore decided this year, in consultation with the responsible bodies of the Swiss financial center, to discontinue LSV+ and BDD at the end of September 2028. This decision reflects the general trend away from traditional payment methods towards modern, digital solutions.
Specifically, the discontinuation means that LSV+/BDD direct debits will only be possible until 30 September 2028. However, this does not mean the end of direct debits in Switzerland. Even if the number of direct debits processed by SIX has stagnated or declined in recent years, SIX still considers the procedures to be an important payment option with various advantages for the payer and the beneficiary. We therefore assume that direct debits will remain attractive for specific use cases. However, in order to satisfy the demand for direct debit solutions in the long term, efficient and fully automated solutions are required, which ideally can be easily and therefore cost-effectively integrated into existing customer portals. This is not the case with LSV+/BDD. With eBill Direct Debit, however, SIX will launch a new digital direct debit procedure in mid-2025 that meets the increased requirements. Pragmatically integrated into the existing eBill ecosystem, which is already familiar to over 3.5 million households, eBill Direct Debit is used for the automated collection of recurring receivables. Both invoice issuers and recipients can easily set up and manage the necessary direct debit authorizations digitally in eBill.
Direct debits have the potential to play a key role in tomorrow’s digital world, especially when combined with instant payments. However, this requires fully digital and integrated processes that meet both the increased customer demand for an easy-to-use solution and the need for efficient and therefore cost-effective operations. Digitizing and embedding direct debit processes into existing digital ecosystems should not only be seen as a necessity, but also as an opportunity to actively shape the future of payments and anticipate the needs of payment stakeholders.
Talk
Helge Kraas, PPI AG, talks about artificial intelligence in payments. The focus will be on fraud detection, instant payments, e-invoices, Request to Pay, personalized financial services, regulation, financial crime and judicious AI decisions.
8 July 2026
Panorama
In German e-commerce, high processing costs are incurred for some payment methods. On average, it costs 10 euros if something goes wrong during a purchase and payment process. One in twenty advance payment transfers and payments on invoice requires manual processing.
Experts
The Swiss payment traffic roadmap contains important dates and developments, such as the introduction of the hybrid address and the migration to the SIC5 platform. It serves as a planning guide for financial institutions and takes into account international standards and developments.
Switzerland introduced instant payments in August 2024. In the SEPA area, initial coverage was 1% of payments; in Switzerland, it was over 95%. The fastest transaction in Switzerland takes only 1.6 seconds, whereas in SEPA it can take up to 10 seconds.
The ISO 20022 harmonization requires that central banks coordinate the further development to prevent implementations from drifting apart. It is still unclear which central authority will be responsible for coordination.
6 September 2023
The IBAN requirement simplifies and standardizes payment transactions, increasing security and transparency. Since 2016, SEPA payments have only been possible with IBAN. Switzerland is also moving to IBAN-only for more efficient payments.
PAY NEWSLETTER
Join our community and never miss an update!
Categories